For nearly a year, experts have observed that vaccines against COVID cannot establish the herd’s immunity to end the pandemic because gene transfer injections do not prevent infection or transmission.
It’s not rocket science, but health officials and government leaders around the world have irrationally argued the opposite and censored everyone – regardless of credentials – who dared to propose alternative approaches.
Now, all of a sudden, the narrative is changing rapidly, with a multitude of these same individuals – true, if you can believe it – acknowledging that the “vaccines” of COVID cannot end the pandemic and that we must learn to live with the virus. Some have even started speaking out against repeated reinforcements, at least at intervals of three to four months.
The main driver of this turn in the pandemic narrative seems to be the emergence of the Omicron variant. Although incredibly contagious, it causes only mild cold symptoms in the vast majority of people, so it essentially penetrates populations, leaving the herd’s natural immunity behind. As a result, many now claim that the end of the pandemic is in sight.1
We continue with COVID
In a January 15, 2022, Trial Site News article, Mary Beth Pfeiffer reported:2
“The director of global infectious diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital predicts what was unthinkable less than a month ago: the end of the pandemic. Dr. Edward Ryan has given startling and encouraging comments on the Omicron variant that give hope for a return to normal.
Among them: Omicron will make amplifiers unnecessary. The COVID virus will join the ranks of the ‘common cold’. And the latest wave will soon enter the “cleaning mode”. “We are fighting the last war with COVID and we should return to normal life,” reads a summary of Dr. Ryan’s comments. “Spring / summer will be very nice!”
According to Ryan, almost 100% of COVID cases in the Boston area are now Omicron, which is good news, as it does not appear to carry any of the more serious side effects seen in previous strains, including Delta. In New England, the current epidemic is projected to disappear quickly and disappear during the month of February 2022. Across the country, Omicron was reportedly responsible for about 73% of all cases in early January 2022.3
Pfeiffer also reports that, according to Ryan, booster shots will not be needed for the Omicron, as by the time a dedicated injection is released, the wave will already be over and over. Ryan reportedly stated that “we will all get it, which will give us the immunity we need to get over it,” referring to Omicron infection.
Ryan’s comments run counter to major medical recommendations, which almost universally require reinforcements for everyone, including children. It is clear, however, that Ryan makes a lot of sense. Amplifiers, although they may seemingly temporarily increase the resistance of a person with a double sting against Omicron, are designed to protect against the original SARS-CoV-2 strain, which no longer exists.
In general, it seems that the only reason a person with a double sting should boost the drug against Omicron is that the first two doses have weakened their immune system so that they are now more vulnerable, even to a milder strain. This downward spiral of negative immunity can only continue if people continue to take boosters, especially mismatches.
Vaccine-induced herd immunity is called a “myth”
In early August 2021, the director of the Oxford Vaccine Group, Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, actually spoke out against the idea that COVID vaccines were the answer everyone was looking for. He then commented on the idea that the herd’s immunity caused by the vaccine against COVID was “mythical”. As reported by Yahoo! News, August 10, 2021:4
“… Pollard … said … that herd immunity is ‘not a possibility’ with the current Delta variant. He called the idea ‘mythical’, warning that vaccine programs should not be developed around it.
“We know very clearly with the coronavirus that this current variant, the Delta variant, will continue to infect people who have been vaccinated, which means that anyone who is still unvaccinated will encounter the virus at some point,” Pollard told the All-Union Parliamentary group (APPG) for coronavirus.
He said that although vaccines could ‘slow down the transmission process’, they cannot currently stop the spread completely.
‘I think we’re here in a situation with this current variant where herd immunity is not possible because it still infects vaccinated individuals,’ he said, predicting that the next thing could be ‘a variant that may be even better in transmission in vaccinated populations.’ He added: “So that’s more of a reason not to do a vaccine program around herd immunity.”
During that same APPG meeting, Professor Paul Hunter of the University of East Anglia stressed that the variants that can avoid COVID vaccines are “absolute inevitability”. Both Pollard and Hunter turned out to be right, as Omicron’s vaccine avoidance capacity is now documented.
Most people are ‘done’ with COVID
The delay given by Omicron could not have come at a better time. At this point, after two years of repeating the provocation of fear, most people are simply fed up. It doesn’t happen often that you keep life that long, and there seems to be a general consensus that people are willing to encourage life even if the danger of COVID still exists.
In an article on the Atlantic on December 22, 2021, Yascha Mounk, an associate professor at Johns Hopkins University and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, noted that “Regardless of the severity of the variant, appetite for closure or other large-scale social interventions they just don’t exist. ” He continues:5
“I feel that everyone I know has COVID … The pattern in my circle of friends corresponds to what is happening in South Africa, where a new variant of the coronavirus Omicron was first identified.
The number of cases in the country has grown rapidly, but the number of deaths so far has grown much, much more gradually – which probably indicates that Omicron is more contagious, but causes less severe diseases than previous variants …
I bet that no matter which way Omicron – or future strains of the disease – go, we will experience the end of the pandemic as a social phenomenon …
Despite the large number of cases, several experts or politicians are proposing austerity measures to slow the spread of the virus. There is simply no appetite for closure or other major social interventions …
Scientists have their own way of deciding that the pandemic is over. But one useful socio-scientific indicator is when people have become accustomed to living with the constant presence of a particular pathogen.
According to that definition, the massive outbreak of Omicron infections that is currently passing through many developed countries, and does not cause more than half the response, marks the end of the pandemic. “
Mounk, like others, pointed out that if Omicron turned out to be as mild as it first seemed – which has since been confirmed – then the herd’s natural immunity would develop as the highly contagious virus spread like wildfire. With that basic line of natural immunity, populations would be far better equipped in the future to cope with all the new strains that emerge, “without a significant increase in mortality.”
A life at risk
Mounk goes on to discuss how people get used to and learn to live with all kinds of risks over time, including direct threats to life and limbs, and that’s exactly the kind of resilience we now see building and expanding:6
“When I was growing up in Germany, I was fascinated by newspaper reports about living in very dangerous places. Baghdad or Tel Aviv residents seemed to be in danger by simply going shopping or meeting friends over a cup of coffee.
How could, I wondered with a mixture of horror and admiration, anyone be willing to take such an existential risk for such trivial pleasure?
But it is true that almost all people, throughout almost the entire recorded history, have faced daily risks of illness or violent death that are far greater than those currently faced by the inhabitants of developed countries.
And despite the true horrors of the past 24 months, this is true even now … The determination to continue with our lives is deeply and perhaps invariably human.
In this sense, the spring of 2020 will be remembered as one of the most unusual periods in history – a time when people completely withdrew from social life to slow the spread of a dangerous pathogen. But what was possible in a few months proved unsustainable for years, let alone decades.
Whatever damage Omicron could do in the near future, we will very likely soon lead lives that will look much more like spring 2019 than spring 2020. “
Do you have a cold, flu or COVID?
Based on what I see around me, the prediction that Omicron will “get” almost everything probably is true. People are sick en masse. The good news is that there is no panic about these cases. Most people now realize there is no need.
In addition, I still recommend treating all COVID symptoms early and aggressively, just in case. As mentioned, the vast majority of SARS-CoV-2 infections are now associated with Omicron, and the underlying symptoms are almost indistinguishable from the common cold and / or flu. The most commonly reported symptoms of Omicron infection are:7
Congestion, sneezing and runny nose
In addition to these, other symptoms commonly reported with SARS-CoV-2 infection, up to and including Delta, include:
- Loss of taste or smell
- Stomach / gastrointestinal pain (which in some cases may be a sign of intestinal clots)8)
- Nausea or vomiting
The key difference in symptomatology between Delta and Omicron is that Omicron does not appear to cause loss of taste and odor, which is often the case with Delta infection (as with previous strains). Fortunately, Omicron also does not appear to be associated with blood clots, like previous strains (especially the initial ones), and is also far less likely to cause severe infection and lung damage.9,10
Treat symptoms early
Given the uncertainties surrounding the diagnosis, it is best to treat cold or flu symptoms early. At the first sign of symptoms, start treatment. Maybe it’s the common cold or the common flu, maybe Omicron is much milder, but since it’s hard to say, it’s best to treat the symptoms as you would treat earlier forms of COVID.
Given how contagious Omicron is, chances are you’ll get it, so buy what you need now so you have it on hand if / when symptoms occur. And remember, this also applies to those who have been bitten, as you are just as likely to get infected – and maybe even more so. Early treatment protocols with proven efficacy include:
- The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance’s (FLCCC) prevention and early treatment at home protocol. They also have in-hospital protocol and long-term guidelines for the treatment of long-term COVID-19 syndrome. A list of doctors who can prescribe ivermectin and other necessary medications can be found at FLCCC website
- AAPS protocol
- Tess Laurie World Health Council Protocol
- American doctors on the front line
Based on my review of these protocols, I have developed the following summary of treatment specifics that I believe are the easiest and most effective.